Hacks and Mods Share (and show off!) your hacks and modifications of the Mini-note

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2008, 01:05 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 74
Default SSD Fetish

Just found this for all those looking/thinking of upping their HDD to an SSD for the mininote...

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...rive,2000.html
McDethWivFries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 06:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 112
Default

Enough said, some serious work here:

How I figured out my OCZ Core 64GB SSD
http://www.alternativerecursion.info/?p=106

This is for the Core 1 OCZ SSD. The Core 2 is harder to get today.
wikifun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 06:38 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mikez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,484
Default

An oversight in the write considerations -
The SSD drive is being treated as a synchronous logical unit - like a single threaded program.
Only they are not built like that - the are multiple, asynchronous, logical units run by a micro-controller - more similar to a multi-threaded program.

The sequence: read an erase block, erase a block, re-write the block is not done in synchronism with the writing data to the buffer.
It may be also performed by multiple asynchronous logical units - -
One maintaining a pool of erased blocks, one erasing a block, one doing the data merge, one doing the ecc - etc.

Translation:
If you delayed the next operation by the equivalent cycle time of the "background processes" to complete after every write (any size) - -
effectively giving the device time to stay in synchronism with the write demands - -
Then the noise (or fishy) measurements in the write performance would be removed from the data.
I.E: The performance software is not designed for SSD measurements, just HDD.
mikez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 09:28 AM   #4 (permalink)
Rob
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 51
Default

Just got my 64Gb OCZ Core Series SSD (finally), cloned my 120Gb HDD to it using HDCLone 3.2 but it does not boot! (just get a cursor). Any ideas, am I doing something stupid? Tried Windows recovery in case it was the MBR but still nothing... Help?! Thanks

EDIT: Just realised I've been stupid - there is obviously no MBR on my newly cloned SSD as I took the 'Partition > Disk' option in HDCLone 3.2 and not 'Disk > Disk' which would have included the MBR. Obvious. Anyway, cloning again now with 'Disk > Disk' (as the Windows Recovery takes you back to SP2) and will see if it works after that.
Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 02:45 AM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 74
Default

Be cool to see how more responsive your 2133 is with the OCZ, they are pretty cheap here . . . well relativly speaking (o:
McDethWivFries is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 04:53 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McDethWivFries
Be cool to see how more responsive your 2133 is with the OCZ, they are pretty cheap here . . . well relativly speaking (o:
It's not all about price...
baius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 04:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McDethWivFries
Be cool to see how more responsive your 2133 is with the OCZ, they are pretty cheap here . . . well relativly speaking (o:
It's not all about price...
baius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 12:49 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob
Just got my 64Gb OCZ Core Series SSD (finally), cloned my 120Gb HDD to it using HDCLone 3.2 but it does not boot! (just get a cursor). Any ideas, am I doing something stupid? Tried Windows recovery in case it was the MBR but still nothing... Help?! Thanks

EDIT: Just realised I've been stupid - there is obviously no MBR on my newly cloned SSD as I took the 'Partition > Disk' option in HDCLone 3.2 and not 'Disk > Disk' which would have included the MBR. Obvious. Anyway, cloning again now with 'Disk > Disk' (as the Windows Recovery takes you back to SP2) and will see if it works after that.
So, did the 2nd method work?
gregw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 12:49 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob
Just got my 64Gb OCZ Core Series SSD (finally), cloned my 120Gb HDD to it using HDCLone 3.2 but it does not boot! (just get a cursor). Any ideas, am I doing something stupid? Tried Windows recovery in case it was the MBR but still nothing... Help?! Thanks

EDIT: Just realised I've been stupid - there is obviously no MBR on my newly cloned SSD as I took the 'Partition > Disk' option in HDCLone 3.2 and not 'Disk > Disk' which would have included the MBR. Obvious. Anyway, cloning again now with 'Disk > Disk' (as the Windows Recovery takes you back to SP2) and will see if it works after that.
So, did the 2nd method work?
gregw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2008, 11:16 PM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 47
Default

any particular performance gains with an SSD over a standard HDD? Faster write speeds? Battery life?
diasbora is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2133, 2140, battery, boot, upgrade, vista, win xp, windows, windows 7

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On